外资机构观点趋于一致:看多中国经济 做多中国资产******
随着A股2023年强势开局,外资唱多热情持续高涨,继高盛之后,摩根士丹利也加入了再次看涨A股和人民币的队伍。
据证券时报记者了解,不少外资机构对中国资产的看法更加乐观,认为新年行情值得期待。
开年以来北向资金加速流入也证实了这一点。2023年以来,北向资金净流入额超330亿元,自2022年11月以来的净流入额已接近1300亿元。
上调中国股票市场评级
华尔街大行高盛刚发布策略报告,将明晟中国指数12个月目标从70点上调至80点,摩根士丹利紧随其后,也将明晟中国指数的年底目标上调至80点。
1月9日,摩根士丹利分析师Laura Wang等人在最新报告中指出,2023年中国GDP和企业利润将加速增长,中国股市将成为全球表现最佳的股市。摩根士丹利维持增配明晟中国指数,并将该指数年底目标位从70点上调至80点。
摩根士丹利研报指出,2023年中国的GDP和企业利润将加速增长,同时内外部风险均下降,这或将推动相关估值进一步上涨。
明晟中国指数最新收盘报70.42点,自去年10月底最低点46.92点以来,已经累计反弹50%。摩根士丹利将该指数目标点位上调至80点,认为该指数还有超过10%的上涨空间。
去年12月,摩根士丹利上调中国股票在全球新兴市场中的评级至“超配”,这是该机构对中国股市维持近两年谨慎态度后做出的首度上调。
在进一步上调明晟中国指数目标位时,摩根士丹利指出,其正在对中国股权风险溢价(ERP)重新评估,不少因素证明属于A股的牛市周期已经开启。
对于人民币走势,摩根士丹利同样乐观。它认为,人民币到2023年底将升至1美元兑6.65元人民币,较当前水平上涨1.8%。
摩根士丹利中国首席市场策略师王滢表示,摩根士丹利目前对欧美股市、尤其美国市场较为谨慎,中国股市将成为下一阶段全球股市的领跑者,全球新兴市场都将有不错表现。“我们对中国股票市场评级上调,不仅仅是基于抗疫政策的调整。根据我们的历史经验,有七个主要类别因子,会在不同时间对股市产生较大影响,可以帮助我们更好捕捉股市的拐点。”她说。
王滢进一步分析,“尽管宏观经济和估值两大因子并不突出,但其余五大因子正同时向好转变,包括全球收紧的流动性在明年会有明显改善;中国政策周期向好;强势美元告一段落,人民币有望重新升值;中美双边关系改善;中国的监管框架已经整体确立。”
看多中国资产再成共识
随着中国经济的复苏预期不断增强,A股市场与人民币汇率强势表现,外资“真金白银”加码买进中国资产。
Wind数据显示,2023年以来,北向资金已净买入335.20亿元,其中1月5日净买入127.53亿元,这也是自2022年12月1日以来,北向资金再度单日净买入超百亿。实际上,自2022年11月以来,北向资金就已呈现出加速流入的势头,期间净买入额达1286.28亿元。
人民币汇率在此期间也强势反弹。2023年首个交易日,在岸及离岸人民币兑美元汇率盘中双双升破6.9关口。随后,人民币汇率持续反弹走强,截至1月10日16时30分,在岸人民币兑美元收盘报6.7772,新年以来已反弹逾1800点,累计涨幅达2.61%。
北向资金与人民币汇率共振,反映了外资机构对中国资产的普遍看好。高盛1月9日发布报告称,中国股市在年内有望上涨15%,人民币则料将升至去年4月以来的最高位。
高盛的策略报告称,将明晟中国指数的12个月目标从70点上调至80点,强调主要理由是整体估值较低,以及房地产、互联网监管和政策刺激等领域的多个支撑点。
此外,高盛预计到今年年底人民币兑美元将升至6.5,此前的预估值为6.9。
高盛策略团队认为:“在2023年的全球背景下,中国在经济增长、政策和通胀周期方面看起来处于有利地位。当前的市场背景让我们相信,继续减持或做空中国股票面临的风险明显高于做多中国股票。”
除高盛外,美国银行、汇丰银行、先锋领航等外资机构也看好2023年中国资产表现。
美国银行投资策略分析师曾指出2023年的十大交易趋势,其中的一大趋势便是做多中国股票。“中国有很高的超额储蓄,对中国股票仍然是反向做多交易策略。”
汇丰银行预测2023年中国GDP同比增速为5.0%,并显著调高了2024年中国GDP增速预测,从4.8%上调至5.8%。
先锋领航在最新发布的分析报告中指出,当前中国正致力于优化疫情防控措施、促进疫苗和药品研发、改善医院设施,这些手段有助于稳定经济,预计2023年3月之后,中国的整体经济将看到更为明显的反弹,中国2023年全年GDP的增速有望达到4.5%左右。
中新网评:处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******
中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称,将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对,企图将核污水“一倒了之”,把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。
资料图:日本福岛第一核电站。2011年,福岛核电站事故发生后,大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋,对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害,数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日,作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。
日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由,在2021年4月13日,正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多,日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。
日本政府辩称,这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全,甚至“可以喝”,这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。
事实上,经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质,核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收,长期来看,将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁,最终危害人类健康。
因此,核污水排海计划推出后,遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示,福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中,约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场,反对该计划。
日本政府认为,核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案,但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海,核污水会随着洋流流动,其影响势必会跨越国界,危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。
《韩国经济新闻》发文称,相关研究认为,福岛核污水如果排放入海,约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域,该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。
德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告,若日本将所有核污水排入海中,不到半年,整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁,包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。
日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国,有义务保护海洋环境。然而,在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上,日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。
国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估,但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论,并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下,日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设,这是极不负责任的行为。
太平洋不是日本的下水道,日本必须正视各方合理关切,在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后,制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远,若只顾眼前,执意将核污水排放入海,不仅其自身,周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单,其后果必将会危害数代人。
Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business
By John Lee
(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.
Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.
The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.
On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.
The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.
In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.
Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.
The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.
The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.
The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.
According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.
As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.
However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.
Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.
The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.
If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.
中国网客户端 国家重点新闻网站,9语种权威发布 |